Add the repo-side pieces for milestone 5: MIT licensing, real maintainer and forge metadata, a public support doc, 1.0.0 release notes, release-prep tooling, and CI uploads for the full candidate artifact set. Keep source-tree version surfaces honest by reading the local project version in the CLI and About dialog, and cover the new release-prep plus version-fallback behavior with focused tests. Document where raw validation evidence belongs, add the GA validation rollup, and archive the latest readiness review. Milestone 5 remains open until the forge release page is published and the milestone 2 and 3 matrices are filled with linked manual evidence. Validation: PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p 'test_*.py'; PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m unittest tests.test_release_prep tests.test_portable_bundle tests.test_aman_cli tests.test_config_ui; python3 -m py_compile src/*.py tests/*.py; PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m aman version
61 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
61 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# Milestone 5: GA Candidate Validation and Release
|
|
|
|
## Why this milestone exists
|
|
|
|
The final step to GA is not more feature work. It is proving that Aman has a real public release surface, complete support metadata, and evidence-backed confidence across the supported X11 environment.
|
|
|
|
## Problems it closes
|
|
|
|
- The project still looks pre-GA from a trust and release perspective.
|
|
- Legal and package metadata are incomplete.
|
|
- Release artifact publication and checksum expectations are not yet fully defined.
|
|
- The current release checklist does not yet capture all GA evidence.
|
|
|
|
## In scope
|
|
|
|
- Publish the first GA release as `1.0.0`.
|
|
- Add a real `LICENSE` file.
|
|
- Replace placeholder maintainer metadata and example URLs with real project metadata.
|
|
- Publish release artifacts and checksums for the portable X11 bundle.
|
|
- Keep native `.deb` and Arch package outputs as secondary artifacts when available.
|
|
- Publish release notes that describe the supported environment, install path, recovery path, and non-goals.
|
|
- Document support and issue-reporting channels.
|
|
- Complete the representative distro validation matrix.
|
|
- Add explicit GA signoff to the release checklist.
|
|
|
|
## Out of scope
|
|
|
|
- Expanding the GA promise beyond X11.
|
|
- Supporting every distro with a native package.
|
|
- New features that are not required to ship and support the release.
|
|
|
|
## Dependencies
|
|
|
|
- Milestones 1 through 4 complete.
|
|
- Existing packaging and release-check workflows.
|
|
- Final validation evidence from the representative distro families.
|
|
|
|
## Definition of done: objective
|
|
|
|
- The release version is `1.0.0`.
|
|
- A `LICENSE` file exists in the repository.
|
|
- `pyproject.toml`, package templates, and release docs contain real maintainer and project metadata.
|
|
- Portable release artifacts and checksum files are published.
|
|
- The release notes include install, update, uninstall, troubleshooting, and support/reporting guidance.
|
|
- A final validation report exists for Debian/Ubuntu, Arch, Fedora, and openSUSE.
|
|
- The release checklist includes and passes an explicit GA signoff section.
|
|
|
|
## Definition of done: subjective
|
|
|
|
- An external evaluator sees a maintained product with a credible release process.
|
|
- The release feels safe to recommend to X11 users without author hand-holding.
|
|
- The project no longer signals "preview" through missing metadata or unclear release mechanics.
|
|
|
|
## Evidence required to close
|
|
|
|
- Published `1.0.0` release page with artifacts and checksums.
|
|
- Final changelog and release notes.
|
|
- Completed validation report for the representative distro families.
|
|
- Updated release checklist with signed-off GA criteria.
|
|
- Public support/reporting instructions that match the shipped product.
|
|
- Raw validation evidence stored in `user-readiness/<linux-timestamp>.md` and linked from the validation matrices.
|