pyro-mcp/docs/roadmap/llm-chat-ergonomics.md
Thales Maciel 446f7fce04 Add workspace naming and discovery
Make concurrent workspaces easier to rediscover and resume without relying on opaque IDs alone.

Add optional workspace names, key/value labels, workspace list, and workspace update across the CLI, Python SDK, and MCP surface, and persist last_activity_at so list ordering reflects real mutating activity.

Update the stable contract, install/first-run docs, roadmap, and Python workspace example to teach the new discovery flow, and validate it with focused manager/CLI/API/server coverage plus uv lock, make check, make dist-check, and a real multi-workspace smoke for create, list, update, exec, reorder, and delete.
2026-03-12 23:16:10 -03:00

74 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

# LLM Chat Ergonomics Roadmap
This roadmap picks up after the completed workspace GA plan and focuses on one
goal:
make the core agent-workspace use cases feel trivial from a chat-driven LLM
interface.
Current baseline is `3.3.0`:
- the stable workspace contract exists across CLI, SDK, and MCP
- one-shot `pyro run` still exists as the narrow entrypoint
- workspaces already support seeding, sync push, exec, export, diff, snapshots,
reset, services, PTY shells, secrets, network policy, and published ports
- stopped-workspace disk tools now exist, but remain explicitly secondary
## What "Trivial In Chat" Means
The roadmap is done only when a chat-driven LLM can cover the main use cases
without awkward shell choreography or hidden host-side glue:
- cold-start repo validation
- repro plus fix loops
- parallel isolated workspaces for multiple issues or PRs
- unsafe or untrusted code inspection
- review and evaluation workflows
More concretely, the model should not need to:
- patch files through shell-escaped `printf` or heredoc tricks
- rely on opaque workspace IDs without a discovery surface
- consume raw terminal control sequences as normal shell output
- choose from an unnecessarily large tool surface when a smaller profile would
work
## Locked Decisions
- keep the workspace product identity central; do not drift toward CI, queue,
or runner abstractions
- keep disk tools secondary and do not make them the main chat-facing surface
- prefer narrow tool profiles and structured outputs over more raw shell calls
- every milestone below must update CLI, SDK, and MCP together
- every milestone below must also update docs, help text, runnable examples,
and at least one real smoke scenario
## Milestones
1. [`3.2.0` Model-Native Workspace File Ops](llm-chat-ergonomics/3.2.0-model-native-workspace-file-ops.md) - Done
2. [`3.3.0` Workspace Naming And Discovery](llm-chat-ergonomics/3.3.0-workspace-naming-and-discovery.md) - Done
3. [`3.4.0` Tool Profiles And Canonical Chat Flows](llm-chat-ergonomics/3.4.0-tool-profiles-and-canonical-chat-flows.md)
4. [`3.5.0` Chat-Friendly Shell Output](llm-chat-ergonomics/3.5.0-chat-friendly-shell-output.md)
5. [`3.6.0` Use-Case Recipes And Smoke Packs](llm-chat-ergonomics/3.6.0-use-case-recipes-and-smoke-packs.md)
Completed so far:
- `3.2.0` added model-native `workspace file *` and `workspace patch apply` so chat-driven agents
can inspect and edit `/workspace` without shell-escaped file mutation flows.
- `3.3.0` added workspace names, key/value labels, `workspace list`, `workspace update`, and
`last_activity_at` tracking so humans and chat-driven agents can rediscover and resume the right
workspace without external notes.
## Expected Outcome
After this roadmap, the product should still look like an agent workspace, not
like a CI runner with more isolation.
The intended model-facing shape is:
- one-shot work starts with `vm_run`
- persistent work moves to a small workspace-first contract
- file edits are structured and model-native
- workspace discovery is human and model-friendly
- shells are readable in chat
- the five core use cases are documented and smoke-tested end to end