Capture the next UX pass after the workspace-core readiness review so the roadmap reflects the remaining friction a new chat-host user still feels. Add milestones for trustworthy use-case smoke coverage, host-specific Claude/Codex/OpenCode MCP onramps, and the planned 4.0 default flip to workspace-core so the bare server entrypoint finally matches the recommended path. This is a docs-only roadmap update based on the live use-case review and integration validation, with the full advanced surface kept as an explicit opt-in rather than the default.
2 KiB
2 KiB
3.10.0 Use-Case Smoke Trust And Recipe Fidelity
Status: Planned
Goal
Make the documented use-case pack trustworthy enough to act like a real release gate for the advertised chat-first workflows.
Public API Changes
No new core API is required in this milestone.
The user-visible change is reliability and alignment:
make smoke-use-casesshould pass cleanly on a supported host- each smoke scenario should verify the same user-facing path the recipe docs actually recommend
- smoke assertions should prefer structured CLI, SDK, or MCP results over brittle checks against human-mode text formatting when both exist
Implementation Boundaries
- fix the current repro-plus-fix drift as part of this milestone
- keep the focus on user-facing flow fidelity, not on broad internal test harness refactors
- prefer exact recipe fidelity over inventing more synthetic smoke-only steps
- if the docs say one workflow is canonical, the smoke should exercise that same workflow directly
Non-Goals
- no new workspace capability just to make the smoke harness easier to write
- no conversion of the product into a CI/reporting framework
- no requirement that every README transcript becomes a literal byte-for-byte golden test
Acceptance Scenarios
make smoke-use-casespasses end to end on a supported host- the repro-plus-fix smoke proves the documented patch path without relying on fragile human-output assumptions
- each use-case recipe still maps to one real guest-backed smoke target
- a maintainer can trust a red smoke result as a real user-facing regression, not just harness drift
Required Repo Updates
- use-case smoke scenarios audited and corrected to follow the canonical docs
- any brittle human-output assertions replaced with structured checks where possible
- docs updated if a recipe or expected output changed during the alignment pass
- at least one release/readiness note should point to the smoke pack as a trustworthy verification path once this lands